Extended · To what extent · AO3
[6 marks]
Hearth & Oak is deciding whether to launch its "Design my room" feature using a diffusion model trained only on licensed images and its own product photos. To what extent would this be a good decision? In your answer, consider image quality, speed and ethical issues.
0 words
Marking points and model answer
A model answer
A diffusion model is a sensible choice for quality: it produces realistic, varied rooms and follows a customer's description well, and fine-tuning on Hearth & Oak's own studio photos helps it show the actual products accurately. A dataset of only licensed images is smaller, though, so the model may handle unusual requests ("a houseboat with a velvet sofa") poorly.
Speed is the main weakness. Each image needs many denoising passes, so a customer may wait, and every press of the button costs GPU time. Running diffusion in latent space and using a distilled model with only a few steps would bring this down to a few seconds.
Ethically, licensed data is a strong choice: Hearth & Oak can show it had permission for everything it trained on, which protects a brand built on trust. It still needs to check its rooms are not all one style of home and to label images as AI-generated so customers do not mistake a scene for a photo.
Overall it is a good decision to a large extent, provided Hearth & Oak uses a fast, distilled model so the feature responds quickly, and labels the images clearly.
For each point, does your answer make it? Be strict: a marker would be.
Earns nothing
- A list of features of diffusion models not linked to the company.
Mark every point to see your total.